Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:45:13 -0800
From:      Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>, Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>, FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG>, re@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 5.0 showstopper 
Message-ID:  <20021214004513.733AB2A7EA@canning.wemm.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0212131309480.9978-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > 
> > > In the last episode (Dec 13), Julian Elischer said:
> > > > It's always been there. the question is 
> > > > "Who has broken it?"
> > 
> > I think this is a 5.0 showstopper. Having 5.0 overwrite your
> > Windows partition would be "poor" PR.
> > Having a quick look at it, it shouldn't be too hard for PHK
> > to fix it as he has all the correct parts currently "loaded"
> > into his head. Especially such things as making GEOM not allow writes
> > to -ve blocknumbers (as must have happenned for root to have been
> > overwritten).
> 
> 
> looking at the code in src/sys/i386/i386/dump_machdep.c,
> 
> we see:
>   78         dumplo = di->mediaoffset + di->mediasize - Maxmem *
> (off_t)PAGE_SIZE;
>   79         dumplo -= sizeof kdh * 2;
>   80         i = di->dumper(di->priv, &kdh, 0, dumplo, sizeof kdh);
>   81         if (i)
>   82                 printf("\nDump failed writing header (%d)\n", i);
>   83         dumplo += sizeof kdh;
>   84         i = 0;
> 
> It looks like the following test should go after line 77
>  
> 	if (di->mediasize <  ((Maxmem * (off_t)PAGE_SIZE) +
> 	     (sizeof kdh * 2) + (16*1024)) {
> 			/* 16K is an arbitrary  buffer
> 			 * in case the swap part is
> 			 * the first part
> 			 */
> 		printf("\nDump failed. Partition too small.\n");
> 		return;
> 	}

We used to force a 64K safety buffer for swapon, and I think we also did
64K for dump before the last MI dump code conversion.  I'd feel a little
happier if you used 64K here instead of 16K.


Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021214004513.733AB2A7EA>