Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:51:21 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark <peo@intersonic.se> To: Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com> Subject: Re: rtfree: 0xc741ee88 has 1 refs Message-ID: <4730C5B9.1030709@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <b1fa29170711061015l67d999ceqfcdf1d668d18ad6b@mail.gmail.com> References: <472B1E89.5080006@moneybookers.com> <47303578.8060703@moneybookers.com> <4730AA30.7090607@intersonic.se> <b1fa29170711061015l67d999ceqfcdf1d668d18ad6b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kip Macy wrote: <snip> >>>> >>>> so everytime when 10.1.1.2 try to contact someone from 10.10.1.1/24 I >>>> see: >>>> rtfree: 0xc741ee88 has 1 refs >>>> >>>> if I add direct route on 10.1.1.2 to 10.10.1.1/24 through 10.1.1.3 the >>>> message will go away. >>>> >>>> Should I ignore this msg for now, or should I expect kernel panic >>>> soon? :) >> Just FYI, I see this on a few boxes including the 7-BETA2 I'm writing >> this on. None of them has a carp interface though. What I find >> interesting here is that none of them are able to run a SMP kernel >> without crashing (no panic, they're just frozen completely). >> >> Perhaps it is a coincidence, I don't know, but I am very interested in >> your findings and have testbeds if you need. >> > > The warning is mostly harmless. It means that rtfree is being called > where RTFREE_LOCKED should be used. Adding a kdb_backtrace() should > track it down for you. "Mostly", meaning that in some cases it actually does harm? I cannot help noting the fact I decribed above but as I have not investigated it it may as well be just a coincidence. I hope I can set aside some time to investigate it further. --per
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4730C5B9.1030709>