Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 21:30:51 -0400 From: Bill Vermillion <bv@wjv.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lots of input errors... Message-ID: <20030626013051.GF7355@wjv.com> In-Reply-To: <20030625170140.E64272@fubar.adept.org> References: <05c301c33b51$3d2db020$85dd75d8@shawn> <20030625161455.L64272@fubar.adept.org> <068501c33b74$ff3d04e0$85dd75d8@shawn> <20030625170140.E64272@fubar.adept.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Hoskins, the prominent pundit, on Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 17:13 while half mumbling, half-witicized: > On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Shawn Ramsey wrote: > > > I don't know offhand, it connects to another company, as its > > our internet connection. We will contact them and see if they > > can tell us what the stats (if any, I believe its a Cisco). > > The card is forced to 100BT/FD on our end, and im sure it is > > on the other end, though I will have them double check that > > as well. Performance at autoneg is terrible fwiw... > Ahh, Cisco's signature mark. ;) If you know you'll always use > 100BT/FD, it wouldn't hurt to have your ISP set the port to > that as well (just to be safe). A good reference to all the negotiation problems with Cisco can be found at: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/46.html > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list Bill -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030626013051.GF7355>