Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 18:12:18 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Cc: Matthew Thyer <thyerm@eddie.dsto.defence.gov.au>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is tickadj still required in -CURRENT ? Message-ID: <5743.907863138@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "08 Oct 1998 17:48:00 %2B0200." <xzpsogzys0f.fsf@hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <xzpsogzys0f.fsf@hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no>, Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes: >> In message <199810081342.XAA01038@eddie.dsto.defence.gov.au>, Matthew Thyer writes: >> > So, has FreeBSD-CURRENT's kernel been fixed and can tickadj be removed >> > from the base system ? >> Yes and no. > >Care to elaborate, or are we just too stupid to comprehend the depth >of Your Maginificence's explanation? Yes, it has been fixed. No, it hasn't been removed. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5743.907863138>