Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Aug 1996 19:27:44 +1000
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        BRETT_GLASS@ccgate.infoworld.com, rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com
Cc:        hardware@freebsd.org, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, randy@zyzzyva.com
Subject:   Re: Mapped geometry vs. Actual
Message-ID:  <199608050927.TAA09191@godzilla.zeta.org.au>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> It seems as if it also tries to force disk slices to
>> cylinder boundaries -- which is silly on ZBR drives or when sector mapping
>> is done.

>That is to maintain compatibility with other operating systems, if you don't
>do this some other OS's fdisk may try to ``fix'' your MBR partition table
>for you and make a royal mess of things instead.

Sysinstall may do this, but fdisk(8) lets you put the slices wherever you
want.

>Cylinder bondaries alignment must be retained if you ever let anything
>bug FreeBSD /sbin/fdisk near your disk drive.

Wrong.  The primary DOS partition is normally NOT aligned to a cylinder
boundary.  It normally starts 1 track after a cylinder boundary.  I
used to start it 1 sector after a cylinder boundary.  DOS 3.2 had no
problems with this.  Logical drives within extended partitions are normally
NOT aligned to a cylinder boundary.  They normally start 1 track after
a cylinder boundary (1 track after the start of an extended partition
which normally does start on a cylinder boundary).

Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608050927.TAA09191>