Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:28:42 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern imgact_elf.c Message-ID: <20040719172842.GC92908@horsey.gshapiro.net> In-Reply-To: <20040719171041.GA22048@ns1.xcllnt.net> References: <200407182028.i6IKS7Su002490@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040719034245.C32601@pooker.samsco.org> <20040719171041.GA22048@ns1.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I've seen concern (maybe in private email, can't check at the moment) > > recently that loosing the PID info is undesirable. Is there any way that > > it can be included again, maybe in something other than a PRSTATUS object? Another option would be to record the PID in the file name (changing kern.corefile from %N.core to %N.%P.core for example). This has the added benefit of allowing for multiple cores if a buggy process dies more often than an admin can collect the cores. However, that benefit is also a disadvantage as it has disk-filling potential.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040719172842.GC92908>