Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:55:26 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPU utilization Message-ID: <evl374$j0v$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <86hcrlzxfe.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <461E0078.3050001@cisco.com> <86hcrlzxfe.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig02F4294606C19DBBFBD5C489 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > By default, 6.2 doesn't schedule processes on the virtual core on a > hyperthreading CPU. I'm puzzled why is it different in HEAD - does 7-current have some=20 security-related fixes in scheduling, or something similar? I know that=20 disabling hyperthreading was done because of security concerns=20 (information leakage). --------------enig02F4294606C19DBBFBD5C489 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGHhAkldnAQVacBcgRAjimAJ46gw/N8k/JO6frQpQE6R5nhMjcTgCg2an5 whAMonB7Vz3KIHC0XljnRy8= =KJ55 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig02F4294606C19DBBFBD5C489--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?evl374$j0v$1>