Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:16:58 -0700
From:      Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
To:        Patrick Thomas <root@utility.clubscholarship.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: resolver workaround conceptually possible ? 
Message-ID:  <20020716181658.CE9A03927@overcee.wemm.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020716110540.N79469-100000@utility.clubscholarship.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Patrick Thomas wrote:
> 
> I am under the impression that at this time there is no workaround for the
> resolver problem - you are forced to reinstall or upgrade.
> 
> I am curious though, is it at least conceptually possible that there could
> be a workaround ?  If so, what would it entail ?

Assuming that bind9 has been fixed, you could use bind9 for your local
resolver and it will "filter" anything nasty out as a side effect of the
fact that it always constructs replies, rather than caching a reply and
forwarding the reply as-is to the resolver client (as bind8 does).

Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020716181658.CE9A03927>