Date: Mon, 01 Apr 1996 10:27:18 +0000 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: "Frank ten Wolde" <franky@pinewood.nl> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Q] Semantics of 'established' in ipfw tcp Message-ID: <15278.828354438@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 01 Apr 1996 10:20:05 %2B0100." <9604011020.ZM20909@pwood1.pinewood.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I would like to know other people's reactions to the current semantics of > the 'established' keyword for TCP connections in the 2.2-960323-SNAPSHOT > implementation of the ipfw in the kernel. > The problem is in the 'ACK-set' keyword, which is *not* available at this > moment... Yes indeed it is available. You can specify any combination of flags you want. > Your opinions please... :-) I got side tracked by some real-world problems but I'm on my way back to the IPFW stuff. Please send any suggestions you have. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15278.828354438>