Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:10:28 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Ed Maste <emaste@phaedrus.sandvine.ca> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what to replace splnet in FreeBSD 5.x? Message-ID: <20050712230952.U70082@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20050712220452.GB38249@sandvine.com> References: <42CEF0EB.4000107@borderware.com> <42D006DB.8080108@errno.com> <20050712150224.GA38249@sandvine.com> <20050712162332.Q79478@fledge.watson.org> <20050712220452.GB38249@sandvine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Ed Maste wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 04:30:18PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > >> I'm concerned about the multicast address list problems you've been >> experiencing, but haven't yet had a chance to investigate. If you >> could provide a code fragment that exercises this problem, that would >> probably get me started a lot more quickly. > > Thanks Robert. So far we've reproduced it only within our test lab > environment and with our product executables -- a large amount of code > and infrastructure. I've attempted to reduce it to a small amount of > code that demonstrates the problem but have had no success yet. I've done SMP-based stress-testing with the regular address lists, but not with the multicast address lists. I'll try to take a look this upcoming weekend. Thanks, Robert N M Watson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050712230952.U70082>