Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 07:39:49 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: initialise ports tree (WAS: long string using find and "-exec ls -ls" to find part-of filename) Message-ID: <20140703073949.6a82041d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20140701052711.GA30357@ethic.thought.org> References: <20140630045605.GA11147@ethic.thought.org> <53B0EFF2.80205@calorieking.com> <CA%2Bg%2BBvg1=o71ObOpbh4ry-=unj2HOjjmcQHX1DOeAfwyhLu=QQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140630053004.GB16901@ethic.thought.org> <CA%2Bg%2BBvh%2BDk0iYCjbGKVt59-nfDoCFQ6qmArrJu7ueaT7VzDi1g@mail.gmail.com> <20140630064044.GA25085@ethic.thought.org> <20140630230316.44ec3257.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140630213909.GA21861@ethic.thought.org> <20140630235832.9ec60e91.freebsd@edvax.de> <53B21850.6060904@calorieking.com> <20140701052711.GA30357@ethic.thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:27:11 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > ===== > Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. > Of_Interest: With 27++ years of service to the Unix community. > > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 10:09:20AM +0800, Gregory Orange wrote: > > On 01/07/14 05:58, Polytropon wrote: > > >On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:39:09 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > >> One totally OT thing. my sysadmin is or will be on his honeymoon > > >> but installed FBSD 10.X. without ports. do you know what magic > > >> command I use to install the entire ports tree? > > > > > >You can either use the installation media or pull it from FTP: > > > > Why not use portsnap? It's just so easy. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-using.html > > > > # portsnap fetch extract > > [...] > > "portsnap"; indeed. This is probably the most convenient method both for initializing and updating your ports tree if you don't need split-second deltas (which only SVN can deliver). :-) > I was betting that it wouldnt be there > but yeah, zeus loves me. It's an essential port of the _operating system_ itself. Partially off-topic addition (which I think I can address to the list in case a direct message doesn't come through): When using "reply all", I got an error message from your MTA (via the relay of my ISP). This is the message (trimmed): <kline@thought.org>: host smtp.secureserver.net[68.178.213.203] said: 552 5.2.0 This message has been rejected due to content judged to be spam by the internet community??IB212 <http://x.co/crbounce>; (in reply to end of DATA command) Action: failed Status: 5.2.0 Remote-MTA: dns; smtp.secureserver.net Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 552 5.2.0 This message has been rejected due to content judged to be spam by the internet community??IB212 <http://x.co/crbounce>; * end message * The "Internet community" _judges_ message list replies spam? I'm not sure. The reason is explained this way: The email message contains a link, attachment, or pattern caught by our filters as spam. What "pattern" might that be? A code snippet? A stupid code snippet? A HTTP or FTP link? As I said, I'm not sure. Maybe you could check the settings of the installation handling your mail? thought.org mail is handled by 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net. thought.org mail is handled by 0 smtp.secureserver.net. Just to make sure you can continue receiving helpful replies from this list... :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140703073949.6a82041d.freebsd>