Date: 13 Jul 2001 18:06:35 PDT From: Nitin Nahata <nitinnahata@usa.net> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Re: Block Device I/O] Message-ID: <20010714010636.14102.qmail@nwcst320.netaddress.usa.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote: > we couldn't find any reason th have block devices except in teh case fo= r > exporting the nodes via NFS. = > = > The buffer caching is done at teh filesystem level, and raw-io is faste= r > with the raw device, so it was complicating the code without giving us = any > real advantage.. If you need a cached device then you can achieve that = in > other ways. > your comments are appreciated.. > = > = Are there any documents/papers available regarding the current I/O implementation because I am having a little difficulty in understanding how things are working below the vnode/vfs layer? = Thanks, Nitin = > On 13 Jul 2001, Nitin Nahata wrote: > = > > I saw an old message in 1999 freebsd-hackers archive that said that b= lock > > devices were being replaced from freebsd. I tried to follow the trail= of > > the message but could not find anything more.......Also I could not f= ind > > any bdevsw[] in the code. I shall be thankful if anyone could give an= y > > further references about how Block I/O is being implemented now... > > = > > Thanks > > = > > Nitin = > > = > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > = > = > = > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010714010636.14102.qmail>