Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:20:09 GMT From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/90515: Use new patch naming convention in Porter's Handbook Message-ID: <200512162120.jBGLK9Pb087327@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/90515; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/90515: Use new patch naming convention in Porter's Handbook Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:12:48 +0100 Mark Linimon wrote: >On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 09:29:33PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > > >>According to http://wikitest.freebsd.org/moin.cgi/PortsLongtermTargets the new >>patch naming convention requires to use :: signs for specifying paths in the >>patch filenames, e.g. patch-src::config.c, but Porter's Handbook describes the >>old naming convention, e.g. patch-src-config.c. >> >> > >Then the wiki is wrong. The Porter's Handbook is correct. > >Is the other part of your change still relevant even with this being the case? > > No. So, if I make a port, I should use the patch-src-config.c form instead of patch-src::config.c?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200512162120.jBGLK9Pb087327>