Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 May 2013 09:28:10 +0400
From:      Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>
To:        Dmitry Sivachenko <trtrmitya@gmail.com>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl>, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, "John W. O'Brien" <obrienjw@y.saltant.net>, python@FreeBSD.org, Marcus von Appen <mva@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r318575 - in head/math/py-numpy: . files
Message-ID:  <519B05EA.2040101@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <8B6A9B44-1223-462B-BED6-8B95067CBEEF@gmail.com>
References:  <201305200620.r4K6KTnO039444@svn.freebsd.org> <20130520072122.GA1287@medusa.sysfault.org> <6B980234-D2EA-4FEE-A7EF-829F5392E40B@FreeBSD.org> <20130520162827.GB1287@medusa.sysfault.org> <20130520184050.GB31335@slackbox.erewhon.net> <519A7C38.9020109@y.saltant.net> <519B01BF.5040902@yandex.ru> <8B6A9B44-1223-462B-BED6-8B95067CBEEF@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dmitry Sivachenko wrote on 21.05.2013 09:20:
>
> On 21.05.2013, at 9:10, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> wrote:
>
>> John W. O'Brien wrote on 20.05.2013 23:40:
>>>
>>> The attached patch should fix the bulk of the packing plist problems
>>> between pre- and post-PEP-3147 caches. I've smoke tested these with py27
>>> and py33. Improvements are welcome.
>>>
>>> There is still one remaining problem, which is that the following are
>>> only, it seems, installed under py27 but not under py33. If needed, I
>>> should have some spare cycles later to track down the specific condition.
>>
>> John, would you please common pattern for this that already used in the ports tree? Look at /usr/ports/databases/py-fdb/Makefile for example. It's as easy as adding this lines to port's Makefile:
>>
>> .if ${PYTHON_REL} >= 320
>> .include "${FILESDIR}/py3k-fix-pkg-plist.inc"
>> .endif
>
>
> Yes, that seems to be a proper solution.
>
> As far as I remember it was an intention to add that into bsd.python.mk, so every single python-related port does not include this.
> What is the status of this?
>
> Thanks!

It was defined as a hack (by you in particular), so I put it aside for a 
while. Also, Marcus suggested more proper fix, but it's more complex 
(for me to understand). If there is consensus that we can you use this 
temporary, then I can prepare patch for yet another exp-run at the next 
week.

-- 
Regards,
Ruslan

Tinderboxing kills... the drives.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?519B05EA.2040101>