Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:44:28 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net> To: stan <stanb@panix.com> Cc: Free BSD Questions list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 6.1 current instabilty on Sun Ultra 40's Message-ID: <20060831144428.1956286a@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060831040107.GA6371@teddy.fas.com> References: <20060830220228.GB28263@teddy.fas.com> <20060831133935.4b649079@localhost> <20060831040107.GA6371@teddy.fas.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:01:07 -0400
stan <stanb@panix.com> wrote:
> On that disk is a world, built from last weekends cvsup. I was able
> to reproduce it's instability to build a generic kernel. It fails with
> a signal (I believe) 11,
fair enough :)
btw, from past experience, sig_fault 11 usually points to faulty hardware
(usually RAM...) - haven't found them much on BSD, but i'd get them all the
time when using lesser hardware on linux (building kernel was a standard way to
test the hardware back then).... but since you've ruled out hardware... i dont
know what else :)
good luck,
B
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
Don't know. Don't care.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060831144428.1956286a>