Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Feb 2001 02:08:34 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Clive Goodhead <clive@swnet.net>
Cc:        cjclark@alum.mit.edu, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Compiler warning messages
Message-ID:  <20010214020834.C66720@mollari.cthul.hu>
In-Reply-To: <00f701c0966b$f8ee2e80$97393c3e@mshome.net>; from clive@swnet.net on Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 09:52:33AM -0000
References:  <003b01c09666$88e7d820$97393c3e@mshome.net> <20010214012423.Q62368@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> <00f701c0966b$f8ee2e80$97393c3e@mshome.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 09:52:33AM -0000, Clive Goodhead wrote:

> I seem to remember that last time I compiled a new FreeBSD kernel (2.6 at
> least a couple of years ago - I am not that new to FreeBSD) the compile was

ITYM 2.2.6 - there was no FreeBSD 2.6

Recent versions of gcc are much pickier about what they will accept as
"perfect" C code, and we've also enabled more of the warning checks on
recent (post-3.x?) releases.  i.e. we just didn't used to show the
warnings gcc was capable of generating.

Kris

--V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6ilkhWry0BWjoQKURAsbZAJ4yOwQ7bBEXM2FgjDxA0WE9pNpQiACfb4IG
EHuVNkG2VOyxe9YiRmE1ne8=
=v1zv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010214020834.C66720>