Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:54:03 -0400 From: alexus <alexus@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: vpn + samba Message-ID: <6ae50c2d0804201254m248f2bd3nc8c90f215d25919d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6ae50c2d0804201253x349043c1i5189e03345b5d7ba@mail.gmail.com> References: <6ae50c2d0804192219s60bbda73n588969e593c7e05@mail.gmail.com> <fufh6f$ru$1@ger.gmane.org> <6ae50c2d0804200906t350c2694yaaa5871571ed8b86@mail.gmail.com> <9bbcef730804201025k2cee984ctbe244d9d0ec0315c@mail.gmail.com> <6ae50c2d0804201253x349043c1i5189e03345b5d7ba@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: alexus <alexus@gmail.com> Date: Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 3:53 PM Subject: Re: vpn + samba To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> i didn't mean clientless at all, i meant where people can use their build-in clients in OS, like most popular out there is build in client for Windows Vista, XP, Mac OS X, Windows Mobile, PalmOS and Linux. pptp and l2tp, are they even remotly secure? i really wish if we can go with buildin clients only. On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: > 2008/4/20 alexus <alexus@gmail.com>: > > i forgot to mention, i'm not sure if openvpn covers it, but it'd be > > nice if i can have clientless, as we have people using other OSs as > > well, preferable native os client > > You cannot have anything "clientless", only some things for which > there built-in clients in the OS. For Windows, look at l2tp (though > this one is not secure) > -- http://alexus.org/ -- http://alexus.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6ae50c2d0804201254m248f2bd3nc8c90f215d25919d>