Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 May 2002 10:59:34 +1000
From:      "Pietralla, Siegfried P" <siegfried.pietralla@eds.com>
To:        "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   opinion on possible vinum config
Message-ID:  <16649A8D5C73D51183B80008C728EEB7CC0A8F@AUSYM103>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi all,

i've just stumbled across vinum and growfs and i'd like an opinion on the
feasibility of the following implementation:

set up a new disk as one all encompassing partition to be used as one vinum
drive. then create a vinum volume for each required mount point and create
one plex per volume. then add subdisks in 100Mb increments to each plex as
required and use growfs to extend the fs each time a subdisk is added.

does anyone see any major drawbacks? i realise that any fs activity that
spans a subdisk boundary will involve an extra seek, but at one per 100Mb i
don't have any problems with that. my aim here is merely to implement a
flexible, controllable filestore layout - performance as such is not an
issue. i notice that there are limits in vinum: 256 volumes/system ( not an
issue ) and 256 subdisks/plex ( limiting me to 25.6Gb / mount point in my
scenario - i can live with that ). it does not mention a subdisk/drive limit
e.g. a 60Gb drive would have 600 x 100Mb subdisks - is this a problem? also,
is there a limit on how many times you can growfs a fs?

thanx for any feedback,
siegfried.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16649A8D5C73D51183B80008C728EEB7CC0A8F>