Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:45:28 +0200 From: Andreas Kohn <andreas.kohn@gmx.net> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: re@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Scheduler change Message-ID: <1094593528.845.11.camel@klamath.ankon.de.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <413E20FC.80801@samsco.org> References: <413E20FC.80801@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-lkXRVlT4BE3IZo/1UcVT Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 22:58, Scott Long wrote: > All, >=20 > In the interest of getting RELENG_5 stable and ready for 5.3, we are > going to switch the scheduler in 6-CURRENT from SCHED_ULE to SCHED_4BSD. Wouldn't it make more sense to only switch in RELENG_5, and leave it as default in HEAD? Or would it complicate testing and current work too much? Regards, Andreas (This questions basically comes from an interest in good QA and RE practices) --=-lkXRVlT4BE3IZo/1UcVT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBPiv4Yucd7Ow1ygwRAnA2AJ9b1iR/egmX4DxwotxLUm1cVRExFQCfdElc IY5d//XFl72y0yDr/rsQV8Q= =pO9h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-lkXRVlT4BE3IZo/1UcVT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1094593528.845.11.camel>