Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:43:49 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        jchandra@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        mips@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r211280 - in head/sys: conf mips/conf mips/include mips/mips mips/rmi
Message-ID:  <20100813.084349.81694732431589369.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <201008131256.o7DCu0lS006909@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <201008131256.o7DCu0lS006909@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <201008131256.o7DCu0lS006909@svn.freebsd.org>
            "Jayachandran C." <jchandra@freebsd.org> writes:
:   Rename TARGET_XLR_XLS to CPU_RMI to match other CPU_xxx definitions.
:   use CPU_RMI all XLR configurations. Update ident string for N32 and
:   N64 kernels.

I think that we may need more granularity than CPU_CNMIPS in the
future (since there's already two types of CNMIPS we support, with a
third one on the horizon).  Older bits of code have a finer grained
support for CPUs, but that's not currently that consistent inside of
the tree.

Traditionally, the CPU_xxxx has been used both for size control, as
well as behavior tweaking.  The majority of the support in the tree
today with CPU_CNMIPS and CPU_XLR is only for the latter.

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100813.084349.81694732431589369.imp>