Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:23:00 -0500 From: DAve <dave.list@pixelhammer.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is THIS why the 6.2 release seems stalled ? Message-ID: <45A4E8B4.6070401@pixelhammer.com> In-Reply-To: <a969fbd10701092108q766fed5doc2213d229a187669@mail.gmail.com> References: <45A2805E.7060000@ccstores.com> <20070109222558.GA75695@xor.obsecurity.org> <ef10de9a0701091508k7f1775f7h4c2cdc8c7498e7fc@mail.gmail.com> <45A42CF3.4000600@u.washington.edu> <ef10de9a0701092054h157a93a1s8f054e12cb6f91a@mail.gmail.com> <a969fbd10701092108q766fed5doc2213d229a187669@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeff Mohler wrote: > Fbsd needs SAN support before it can cope with > virtualization..virtualization requires a lot of disk..spindles..and > FCP/iSCSI is a great way to drive this condensation. > > I mean..when you have to read this list, and see people wonder which > end of a SAN connection owns the responsibility for fsck'ing a SAN > filesystem, I wonder how quickly I can bone up on Linux. Sorry for wasting your time. I'll neither post nor respond on the iSCSI thread any longer. DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45A4E8B4.6070401>