Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:49:01 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>, jmz@FreeBSD.ORG, sf@FreeBSD.ORG, alex@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XFree86 4.1.0 and include/GL/glu.h Message-ID: <20010608124901.X3278@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <3B210DE6.E938A4B4@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:39:50PM %2B0300 References: <20010608122321.W3278@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> <3B210DE6.E938A4B4@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:39:50PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev (sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG) wrote: > Several days ago I've sent a patch that fixes that problem to portmgr@ > consideration. Check your archives for details Ah, you're right. But I think maybe it would be a good idea just to segregate Mesa3 into two ports, Mesa3 and libglut, because it seems XFree86 provides the full libGL but consistently leaves out all or part of libglut. Or we could just remove GL from the XFree86 install and make it depend on Mesa3 instead... but that wouldn't work (and nor would the first suggestion, but it would affect fewer people since libglut is not really that widely used) if XFree86 has their own local hacks for MesaGL. Anyway, I'm really tired of having to deal with the shortcomings of the XFree86 ports, and they've had too many for the last two years. I really wonder what kind of crack those guys smoke, and where I can get some of it. Perhaps Jean-Marc can tell me. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010608124901.X3278>