Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:01:09 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -pthread cleanup [megapatch] Message-ID: <20010402090109.B6377@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <3AC8147C.2AABBF65@DougBarton.net>; from DougB@DougBarton.net on Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 10:56:12PM -0700 References: <3AC31847.C28A26EB@FreeBSD.org> <3AC8147C.2AABBF65@DougBarton.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 10:56:12PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I would like to put attached patch for testing on bento/beta to check
> > that there are no undesirable side affects. Also I would like to ask
> > maintainers of individual ports listed here to avoid tweaking -pthread
> > in their ports until this patch has been committed to avoid merging
> > conflicts.
>
> First off, in the future please put patches of this size on your web space
> on people.freebsd.org. 111+k e-mails are not bandwidth friendly. Second,
> what will the content of ${PTHREAD_LIBS} be? It's hard to tell whether this
> change will work for my port or not without that information.
PTHREAD_LIBS has been defined in bsd.port.mk for quite some time; it is
"-pthread" on anything less than -current before the libc_r merging,
and "-lc_r" on the latter. Also, in the former case, -D_THREAD_SAFE
is added to CFLAGS (bsd.port.mk, near line 952).
G'luck,
Peter
--
Thit sentence is not self-referential because "thit" is not a word.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010402090109.B6377>