Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:38:26 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <nick@garage.freebsd.pl> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Size-independent byte order swapping functions. Message-ID: <20031125083825.GB511@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20031125011308.GA98148@VARK.homeunix.com> References: <20031124095852.GZ511@garage.freebsd.pl> <20031125011308.GA98148@VARK.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mMdCh5/a0q2ATNCM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:13:08PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: +> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: +> > If one is using strictly defined types as uint8_t, uint16_t, int32_t, = etc. +> > those macros are helpful IMHO, because futher value size changes does = not +> > affects code for byte order managing. This also does not hit perfroman= ce, +> > because this should be resolved at compile-time. +>=20 +> Cool, looks useful. +>=20 +> > I'm not sure if dedicated epanic() is the best way to implement out-of= -range +> > errors prevention - the more handy solution should cause compile error. +>=20 +> See CTASSERT. I've tried, but you can't use CTASSERT() inside (?:). --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek pawel@dawidek.net UNIX Systems Programmer/Administrator http://garage.freebsd.pl Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://cerber.sourceforge.net --mMdCh5/a0q2ATNCM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBP8MVAT/PhmMH/Mf1AQH7nAQAhgM1xRoWwwrno8RtcHwI0tANzHWW8vGE hKf63pMutVAyQ70q4URSMcB49WeMxXvw5q7xdCsdGVaNTP8WNhB7H6VKG0F0Z67g zdpTn3JZ+hR/89h1vsG7HpofoarrdXVrFvTHNSjaqK7zkUpkUf/vdZxSEqy4YhbK sGEnssVeRcw= =xTUS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mMdCh5/a0q2ATNCM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031125083825.GB511>