Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Nov 2000 23:19:09 -0500
From:      "Sean O'Connell" <sean@stat.Duke.EDU>
To:        stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 4.2-BETA hangs on boot
Message-ID:  <20001117231909.C85604@stat.Duke.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <200011172356.QAA78671@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 04:56:25PM -0700
References:  <14869.49927.736257.730814@nomad.yogotech.com> <20001117162836.N62344@bonsai.knology.net> <20001116204344.B62344@bonsai.knology.net> <20001116195957.A62344@bonsai.knology.net> <200011170209.eAH297q51130@drugs.dv.isc.org> <200011172203.PAA77619@harmony.village.org> <200011172237.PAA77876@harmony.village.org> <14869.49927.736257.730814@nomad.yogotech.com> <200011172356.QAA78671@harmony.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh stated:
: P.S.  I am considering changing it back to non-polling given the
: problems.  But that has other problems (eg on some Compaq? machines
: you want to use 3, but using 10 will wedge the machine).

People-

I was one of the folks who really pushed for this mostly because
of the original way in which sysinstall let you pick from one of
three bad choices for which irq's to use for pccards (one of those
choices was 10 .. the one that was hardcoded for the pcic).  I felt
like I was answering the same "ed0: device allocation error" every
day (since it was trying to use 10 but 10 was ... ).  this has been 
helped recently with a higher granularity irq selection menu.

The reasoning behind the polling was that while not optimal, at least,
you _should_ be able to boot FreeBSD with your nic in it and install 
by picking irq 10 (usually free).  This hang on insertion is really 
quite a disappointing development.  I have never seen this, but I don't
think that I have had the opportunity to install on any of the laptops
that are problematic (newer Sony Z505s .. no problem with the R series,
some Compaqs, some Dell's, missing any?).  Maybe our pcic code makes
some assumptions that newer laptops violate... alas, this is out of my
depth.  Should we include a warning sheet with the cd and instructions 
on how to set an irq in the Command Line Configuration boot option?  
Maybe the warning could include some known troublemakers?

One option would be to force people to turn off their onboard serial
console and force the pcic to use irq 4 :)  The thing is that 4 is never
(as best as that can be used in terms of pc hardware .. ha ha ha)
used by another device.   Of course, a lot of folks use their laptops
as portable serial consoles (if you are doing this, you should be able
to ...).

As, a side note, the ability to turn off "plug and play os" support has 
been going away; although it sometimes masquerades as "supported os" with
a "win95/win98/win2000" or "other" option .. not always.  I do like the
way the USB driver will suggest to you that you should disable it.  Maybe
FreeBSD out of the box should just do that.

Sigh.
S
-- 
1--------01---------01--------01--------01--------01--------01--------0
Sean O'Connell                                       sean@stat.Duke.EDU


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001117231909.C85604>