Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Jan 1996 14:57:55 -0700
From:      Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
To:        Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: pppd vs ijppp
Message-ID:  <199601122157.OAA25593@rocky.sri.MT.net>
In-Reply-To: <199601122147.OAA20903@phaeton.artisoft.com>
References:  <Pine.SUN.3.91.960112120254.14135J-100000@lupine.nsi.nasa.gov> <199601122147.OAA20903@phaeton.artisoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert writes:
> > I've done a tad more research (via Lycos) and found that it is indeed 
> > possible that the Compression Control Protocol (CCP) of PPP is patented 
> > by Motorola.  I've not seen any followup, but I've not spent months 
> > looking either...
> 
> Around the same links, you'll find published source for the Cellular
> Phone voice compression technique (this may be less suitable to non
> voice data, but Amancio will probably roll it into VAT now that it
> has been mentioned publically 8-)).

Umm, we already have cellphone compression in our tree already.
ports/audio/gsm. :)


Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601122157.OAA25593>