Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 03:15:11 +0600 (YEKST) From: Anton Voronin <anton@urc.ac.ru> To: <will@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ports/21356: New port: mbone/rat30 (rat-3.0.35), the stable branch. Replaces PR ports/21343. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0104080306060.85576-100000@rnocserv.urc.ac.ru> In-Reply-To: <200104070701.f3771QU40875@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001 will@FreeBSD.ORG wrote: > Synopsis: New port: mbone/rat30 (rat-3.0.35), the stable branch. Replaces PR ports/21343. > > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed > State-Changed-By: will > State-Changed-When: Sat Apr 7 00:00:26 PDT 2001 > State-Changed-Why: > Do we really need this port? mbone/rat is at 4.x, and I don't > know anything about the differences between the two versions. > Can you provide any suitable purpose for such a "stable" port? I personally use this version because although it has less features and codecs than 4.x, it's simpler and works really more stable. Besides, I was able to work in full-duplex with this (using my patches contained in the port), but wasn't with 4.x (I know, 4.x should support full-duplex, but I couldn't make it to use it). Best regards, Anton Voronin Ural Regional Center of FREEnet, Southern Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.31.0104080306060.85576-100000>