Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:50:03 GMT From: Patrick =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Lamaizi=E8re?= <patfbsd@davenulle.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/130895: No man page installed for padlock(4) on amd64 sytstem (Via Nano processor) Message-ID: <200901221850.n0MIo3n0019024@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/130895; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Patrick =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Lamaizi=E8re?= <patfbsd@davenulle.org> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: docs/130895: No man page installed for padlock(4) on amd64 sytstem (Via Nano processor) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:42:00 +0100 > >Description: > > The man page for padlock(4) wasn't installed on a new system that I > built up last night. > > It's a VIA VB8001, running -CURRENT amd64. > > At a guess it's absence might be explained by padlock historically > only existing on 32 bit platforms? The man page source is available > at: > > /usr/src/share/man/man4/man4.i386/padlock.4 Yes because. The padlock(4) driver is built only on i386. > >Fix: > > Possibly just moving the man page source to > > /usr/src/share/man/man4/padlock.4 That's not enought to make it built on amd64. We should include it (at least) in sys/conf/files.amd64 and sys/modules/Makefile The good question is does the actual padlock work on the via nano processor?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200901221850.n0MIo3n0019024>