Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:38:25 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Soren Schmidt <sos@spider.deepcore.dk>
To:        w@dream.vg
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ATAng still problematic
Message-ID:  <200309181638.h8IGcPox025307@spider.deepcore.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20030918155125.GC22643@student.agh.edu.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems Jan Srzednicki wrote:
> > > First of all, the drive still does not get detected properly. Funny
> > > thing is that after some playing with atacontrol attach/detach, it
> > > finally gets detected. And later on, it is normally detected, before.
> > > Same scenario happened like 3 times with ATAng and newer and newer
> > > kernels. I don't know whether some device hints or anything are just
> > > updated; yet, I didn't have _any_ drive detection problems with ATAold.
> > > 
> > > The problem is with the second drive. There's still some randomness in
> > > it, as it gets undetected from time to time.
> > 
> > Try the below patch and let me know if that changes anything..
> 
> It seems that things have changed a bit (the drive gets detected more
> often), but still, it's not perfect.

Perfect ? hmm - I'd settle for works :)

Anyhow, what I need to be able to tell what may be going on, is that
you boot verbose and get me the output from dmesg from a boot that
found all device, and from a boot that missed.

> Anyway, here's backtrace for atapicam panic I've mentioned. It's
> triggered by:

No idea, atapicam is not my area, maybe thomas@ can help...

-Søren



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200309181638.h8IGcPox025307>