Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:42:25 -0600 From: "Gene" <fbsd@brightstar.bomgardner.net> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kalle_M=F8ller_?=<freebsd-questions@k-moeller.dk>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portsnap vs CSup Message-ID: <20090319234025.M71484@brightstar.bomgardner.net> In-Reply-To: <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com> References: <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:39:37 +0100, Kalle Møller wrote > Hi > > I've been digging around, but I can't find a clear answer, which of those > two is the "correct" to use. Hence I don't use one now, so if I'm > going to learn one, I would prefer it to be the right one. > > -- > /km > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- unsubscribe@freebsd.org" `As a veteran of both csup and portsnap, I can say that either does the job admirably. The main difference I've found is that portsnap seems to be faster. Go with your own preferences. IHN, Gene -- To everything there is a season, And a time to every purpose under heaven.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090319234025.M71484>