Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:46:54 +0200 From: "Matthias Andree" <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: "Renato Botelho" <rbgarga@gmail.com>, yuri@rawbw.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ? Message-ID: <op.us10wgsc1e62zd@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <747dc8f30904261039x1c09b723ld351a3bfcbfdaa2e@mail.gmail.com> References: <49F424CA.3040100@rawbw.com> <747dc8f30904261039x1c09b723ld351a3bfcbfdaa2e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 26.04.2009, 19:39 Uhr, schrieb Renato Botelho <rbgarga@gmail.com>: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> wrote: >> I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend >> on >> firefox-2. >> Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? > > You can change gecko engine with WITH_GECKO, if you want > to use libxul, the one firefox3 uses, just use: > > WITH_GECKO=libxul BTW, this appears to be undocumented in the "USERS" section of ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk. Is anybody gonna fix this without a formal PR? <hint, hint> :-) -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.us10wgsc1e62zd>