Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:08:20 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: Assar Westerlund <assar@freebsd.org> Cc: jkh@freebsd.org, Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: telnet broken with auto-negotiation of encrypt/decrypt change Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010326170749.74228T-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <5l1yronujw.fsf@assaris.sics.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It's been a couple of days since you sent this e-mail -- did this change get MFC'd as yet, or are we still waiting for approval? Just want to make sure it gets in before the release. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services On 23 Mar 2001, Assar Westerlund wrote: > Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> writes: > > I'm baffled as to why SRA is enabled by default. I'm fine with it being > > compiled in, but it appears to be substantially interfering with normal > > TCP operation. Either the negotiation needs to be fixed, or this feature > > needs to be disabled for 4.3-RELEASE (either at compile-time or run-time > > is fine). Note that we don't even enable Kerberos* build by default, and > > even when it is built, negotiation is relatively non-interfering for > > non-Kerberos environments. > > I think somebody enabled SRA a long time ago but since autologin was > not enabled, nobody noticed this. I've changed this in > secure/lib/libtelnet/Makefile:1.19 > > Jordan: I think we should MFC this before 4.3. Opinions? > > /assar > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010326170749.74228T-100000>