Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 06 Nov 2011 17:24:21 -0500
From:      Christian Mangin <cmangin@arobas.net>
To:        freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: About Ristretto update
Message-ID:  <4EB70915.9020306@arobas.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAHcdu2qQnBuyNqi%2BsqQAkE_mUFYfLiFSBcK8-B12-BKA-ghagA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAHcdu2qQnBuyNqi%2BsqQAkE_mUFYfLiFSBcK8-B12-BKA-ghagA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 06.11.2011 09:09, Olivier Duchateau a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Stephen Arts (main developper of image viewer for Xfce desktop)
> releases 3 versions of Ristretto [1] [2] [3].
>
> I follow its development, because version 0.1.x and 0.2.x are not
> compatible with my graphics card (I suppose, someone told me, both
> work well), but version 0.3.0 works fine on my desktop.
>
> So which version to put in ports tree ?
>
> You can test each version, you must install Mercurial and clone my
> repository (there're three branches ristretto-0.1, ristretto-0.2, and
> ristretto-0.3):
> for example:
> hg clone  https://code.google.com/p/xfce-ports/ -b ristretto-0.1
> ~/ristretto-0.1.4
>
> Have fun
>
> [1] http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce/2011-November/029442.html
> [2] http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce/2011-November/029443.html
> [3] http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce/2011-November/029444.html
>

I tried all 3 versions with no issues. (on 8.2-stable/amd64 with nvidia
driver)
So version 0.3.0 seems to be the best option since that works for you too.

-- 
Christian




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EB70915.9020306>