Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:01:48 +0300
From:      Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
To:        "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: www/en index.xsl
Message-ID:  <20040921170147.GA44224@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv>
In-Reply-To: <20040921162037.GA13085@dragon.nuxi.com>
References:  <200409201934.i8KJYfcS036447@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040921.054126.07648742.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> <20040920211839.GA15066@hub.freebsd.org> <200409201753.18974.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20040921074025.GA1368@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040921095539.GE4451@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20040921162037.GA13085@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-09-21 09:20, David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 12:55:39PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > > -		x86 compatible, AMD64 compatible, Alpha, IA-64, PC-98
> > > -		and UltraSPARC&#174; architectures.
> > > +		x86 compatible, x86-64 (aka. AMD64) compatible, Alpha/AXP,
> > > +		IA-64, PC-98 and UltraSPARC&#174; architectures.
> ..
> > This one seems nice.  It's hard to see the real changes if wrapping is
> > redone though.  The contraction `aka' is probably something we'd like to
> > avoid too.  How about this one?
> >
> > :             <p>FreeBSD is an advanced operating system for
> > : -             x86 compatible, AMD64 compatible, Alpha, IA-64, PC-98
> > : +             x86 compatible, x86-64 or AMD64 compatible, Alpha/AXP, IA-64, PC-98
>
> The "or" isn't really correct "x86-64/AMD64 compatible" would be closer,
> but people may say that is more confusing than the "aka".  Is "x86-64
> (AMD64) compatible" better?

It seems better.  I could be wrong but this is quickly turning into a very
colourful bikeshed so I think that we should try to reach a compromise between
the x86-64 guys, the AMD64 guys and the "AMD64 or its Intel equivalent" folks.

I was only commenting from an FDP-style POV so that the change wasn't lost in
a greater than necessary diff.  If you think that "x86-64 (AMD64) compatible"
is better, it's better for me too.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040921170147.GA44224>