Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 08 Jul 2006 18:25:21 -0400
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To:        Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Cc:        Veiko Palge <veiko.palge@uni-konstanz.de>, freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: evince so slow (compared to kpdf etc)?
Message-ID:  <1152397521.24207.17.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.tcd5p8ug9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
References:  <1144588215.443907b7e7254@webmail.uni-konstanz.de> <1152388022.44b00bb64b650@webmail.uni-konstanz.de> <1152389031.24207.12.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <op.tcd5p8ug9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-0PfISkWjVSpdIByrHgcX
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 17:21 -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 15:03:51 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke =20
> <marcus@marcuscom.com> wrote:
>=20
> > On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 21:47 +0200, Veiko Palge wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I recompiled poppler by disabling the cairo backend (added
> >> --disable-cairo-output to CONFIGURE_ARGS in poppler Makefile) so that
> >> evince uses the splash backend by default and the problem disappeared!
> >> Evince now renders all kinds of documents it could not render before,
> >> like eg
> >>
> >> http://beige.ucs.indiana.edu/M743/M743.pdf
> >>
> >> The versions are: poppler 0.5.3, evince 0.5.3_1.
> >>
> >> I wonder if the poppler port could be changed so the user can choose
> >> between splash and cairo while compiling the port?  Perhaps a note
> >> about the situation would also be useful?
> >
> > Submit a patch, and we will investigate.  Of course, this PDF should be
> > tested with cairo 1.2.0 to see if that also gets rid of the performance
> > problem.
>=20
> When will cairo 1.2.0 move from MC ports to offical ports tree? I believe=
 =20
> that the 1.2.0 is both source
> and binary compatibility.

For all but bindings.  I don't think we can move it over until we move
over gtk20, cairomm, gtkmm24, etc.  It will probably be safer to wait
for GNOME 2.16.

Joe

--=20
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc

--=-0PfISkWjVSpdIByrHgcX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBEsDDRb2iPiv4Uz4cRAoj4AJ9eIWdj3CRY+tOd7jBle4E5EdsEZACgjCRw
t5egfIefG2nIRgt/pLEdbOg=
=/yk7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-0PfISkWjVSpdIByrHgcX--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1152397521.24207.17.camel>