Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 Oct 1998 18:28:07 -0400
From:      Dan Swartzendruber <dswartz@druber.com>
To:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Cc:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, "Stephen J. Roznowski" <sjr@home.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@time.cdrom.com
Subject:   Re: 3.0 installation problems 
Message-ID:  <3.0.5.32.19981024182807.009be140@mail.kersur.net>
In-Reply-To: <199810242126.OAA01659@dingo.cdrom.com>
References:  <Your message of "Sat, 24 Oct 1998 16:51:02 EDT."             <3.0.5.32.19981024165102.0095ed30@mail.kersur.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 02:26 PM 10/24/98 -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
>
>If all you're doing is editing a few configuration files, emacs is 
>overkill.  Look at the size of the package, for instance.
>
>Emacs is a full-featured editing and develpment system.  You need a 
>text editor.  If you don't like vi (understandable) there are plenty of 
>editors that look-and-feel like emacs but don't come with the enormous 
>bulk and X dependancies.  Use one of these instead; I recommend jove.

That's fine.  I've never used jove.  I use gnu emacs 99.999% of the
time normally, and I don't want to have to keep shifting mental gears.
If jove looks&feels like emacs, that would be fine by me...




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.5.32.19981024182807.009be140>