Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 May 1999 13:31:42 +0930 (CST)
From:      "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
To:        cjclark@home.com
Cc:        freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, dpilgrim@uswest.net, crh@outpost.co.nz
Subject:   Re: SETI@home has teams now!
Message-ID:  <XFMail.990525133142.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <199905250354.XAA05538@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 25-May-99 Crist J. Clark wrote:
>  Is there a reason not to use setiathome's '-nice' switch and just nice
>  it to a low priority? I think that would be good enough for most
>  people. Also, I believe idpro requires root privileges; nice does
>  not. I'd rather not use root when I don't need to. 

I run it like this ->
idprio ${seti_nice} su -m ${seti_user} -c \
"(cd ${seti_wrkdir}/${i} && exec ${PREFIX}/bin/setiathome -email 2>&1 >/dev/null
&)"

So it still runs as nobody.

---
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990525133142.doconnor>