Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 15:17:42 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: Andrey Zonov <zont@freebsd.org>, Edward Tomasz Napierala <trasz@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] unprivileged mlock(2) Message-ID: <CAJ-VmonTAe17Z0Z6y0sWed=EU=yALPo6Nhp_Rw_U8dgCEAcbkw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50463610.6070805@FreeBSD.org> References: <503DD433.2030108@FreeBSD.org> <201208290906.q7T96C9j032802@gw.catspoiler.org> <20120829092318.GW33100@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <503F2D24.8050103@FreeBSD.org> <503F476E.1010505@FreeBSD.org> <50463610.6070805@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On 4 September 2012 10:10, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > And it also makes me wonder why kern/kern_racct.c is marked as standard while > all(?) uses of racct API are placed under RACCT option. > Ditto for kern_rctl.c/RCTL. > I think that excluding these file if the options are not used would help to catch > cases where the API is used unconditionally and it would also help to reduce > kernel sizes a tiny bit too. Thank you very much for considering kernel bloat here. It's this exact kind of tiny bloat that has caused FreeBSD to blow up through "death by a thousand cuts". Anything that we can keep from growing the kernel size is going to make it easier to embed on smaller devices - and there's many, many more embedded targets out there these days versus "PCs" (or macs. :-) Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonTAe17Z0Z6y0sWed=EU=yALPo6Nhp_Rw_U8dgCEAcbkw>