Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 21:48:05 +0400 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org> To: Xavier Beaudouin <kiwi@oav.net> Cc: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> Subject: Re: ports/52877: Non-Maintainer-Update: mail/postfix add support VDA softquotas patch Message-ID: <20030709174805.GN72006@freebsd.org.ru> In-Reply-To: <9860C808-B22C-11D7-9174-000393B64262@oav.net> References: <20030709163808.GK72006@freebsd.org.ru> <9860C808-B22C-11D7-9174-000393B64262@oav.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Xavier Beaudouin wrote: > > Le mercredi, 9 jul 2003, ? 18:38 Europe/Paris, Sergey A. Osokin a ?crit > : > > >On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:33:18PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > >>>>>>>"XB" == Xavier Beaudouin <kiwi@oav.net> writes: > >> > >>XB> Here is the patch for 2.0.13, notice that it is also available at > >>XB> http://www.oav.net/vda/postfix.patch as well > >> > >>Looks ok to me, except I disagree with the bump of PORTREVISION. It > >>is not necessary since no existing installations are affected. > > > >Hmm, I think Xavier Beaudouin add new functionality to this port, > >and the right way is bump PORTREVISION, isn't it? > > Bumping PORTREVISION may not be necessary... Since I added new > functionnality I was thinking it is a good idea. But this part for me > is not really important for me... OK. Another problem is place for patch postfix-2.0.13.v2.patch.gz and I think it must be at ports/distfiles/postfix, right? If answer is yes, I have a following: $ make ===> Extracting for postfix-2.0.13,1 >> Checksum OK for postfix/postfix-2.0.13.tar.gz. >> Checksum OK for postfix/postfix-2.0.13.v2.patch.gz. ===> Patching for postfix-2.0.13,1 ===> Applying distribution patches for postfix-2.0.13,1 File to patch: Any idea? -- Rgdz, /"\ ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN Sergey Osokin aka oZZ, \ / AGAINST HTML MAIL http://ozz.pp.ru/ X AND NEWS / \
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030709174805.GN72006>