Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:39:30 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: UPDATE [Re: Challenge during the ports freeze] Message-ID: <62372893@serv3.int.kfs.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050816163752.GA11023@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:37:52 -0400") References: <20050804211547.GA678@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050816163752.GA11023@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:37:52 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Thanks to the efforts of several people, we're down to just under 300, > and since the freeze has been extended so that users will have the > chance to test packages with the next -BETA3, there's still plenty of > time to fix more packages. > I really encourage you all to take a look at > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-6-failure.html > and work on fixing some of these errors, to help give 6.0-RELEASE the > best possible ports collection during this period of testing and > improvement. Is portmgr@ committing only security patches or the pathes unbreaking the ports as well? Is it much sence to maintainer to approve PRs during the port's freeze? Can one treat a two-weeks silence as maintainer-timeout even at the port's freeze? WBR -- bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62372893>