Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 19:45:27 -0700 From: "Michael K. Smith" <mksmith@noanet.net> To: <webmaster@bmyster.com>, "'Kenneth Culver'" <culverk@yumyumyum.org> Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Question concerning dual-NIC configuration Message-ID: <004001c35c8d$f64fb9b0$40af9240@MKSSONY> In-Reply-To: <1147.66.63.97.2.1060198261.squirrel@bmyster.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
why would ya want to route lo1 127.0.0.1 to a 192.x.x. address ??? seems to me that there are to many system side processes that listen or ocmmunicate thru that...giving access or routing that traffic to a internal address ...doesnt seem to smart to me. --=20 I wouldn't; I was using that as an example. I would want to create a second, separate loopback interface, much in the same way you can do on = a Cisco and then route traffic across both interfaces to the loopback. = All of the addresses would be valid. Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?004001c35c8d$f64fb9b0$40af9240>