Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:03:54 +0000
From:      Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
To:        Arne =?iso-8859-1?Q?Eng=F8?= <arsigen2002@yahoo.no>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Use of the BOOT.FLP floppy disk.
Message-ID:  <20031218110354.GA18028@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20031218102751.95516.qmail@web41213.mail.yahoo.com>
References:  <20031218102751.95516.qmail@web41213.mail.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:27:51AM +0100, Arne Eng=F8 wrote:

> I have been using FreeBSD earlier, but am new to the 5.0-Release.
> The boot.flp image seems to be twice the size of an ordinary floppy, whil=
e the other four images in the floppies-directory fits on exactly one disk =
each. What are the BOOT.FLP disk for ? How is it to be used, and how do I u=
se it on a 1.44 - floppy disk drive system ??? I would appreciate a speedy =
reply, as I'm trying to set up a new system with Freebsd 5.0-release.

You don't use boot.flp with a 1.44Mb floppy drive.  You can use
boot.flp with a 2.88Mb floppy drive, but relatively few people have
one of those.  You can also use it to build certain styles of bootable
CD Rom -- although I think even that use is verging on the obsolete
nowadays.

Instead of boot.flp, use kern.flp and mfsroot.flp -- those contain
exactly the same contents as boot.flp but conveniently divided up into
disk sized pieces.

Oh -- why on earth are you trying to install 5.0-RELEASE when
5.1-RELEASE is available?  Or even better why not try one of the
5.2-BETA images (if you can't afford to wait a few days until
5.2-RELEASE comes out)?  Seriously: the 5.x series so far is a
technology preview: meaning lots of new and untested code that still
has significant bugs to work out.  Each new release in the 5.x series
is a significant improvement on the previous one.  If your aim is a
conservative choice of version -- one that's been around a while and
been thoroughly debugged and is properly stable -- then you want
4.9-RELEASE.

	Cheers,

	Matthew

--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                       26 The Paddocks
                                                      Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey         Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614                                  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK

--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/4YmadtESqEQa7a0RAi8YAJ9OfBW1jepEXmoFbqkeUS5kUr0H1gCdFETo
SpGahSrGwfDCeH9upM/FB5M=
=OZsL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031218110354.GA18028>