Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Dec 2000 01:26:41 -0800
From:      "Crist J. Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net>
To:        Jev <jev@ecad.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, darcy@ok-connect.com
Subject:   Re: Extended ipfw Logging
Message-ID:  <20001212012641.C96105@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <20001211081137.F9536@ecad.org>; from jev@ecad.org on Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 08:11:37AM %2B0000
References:  <20001210222316.A19100@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <20001211081137.F9536@ecad.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 08:11:37AM +0000, Jev wrote:
> 
> I would find this highly useful, would be great if you could turn it
> on/off wuth sysctl :)

Good idea. How's this:

I did not add a new sysctl knob, instead, we still use
net.inet.ip.fw.verbose, except that,

  net.inet.ip.fw.verbose=0	# Logging off
  net.inet.ip.fw.verbose=1	# Regular logging
  net.inet.ip.fw.verbose=2	# Enhanced logging

Obviously, we could utilize more levels... but keep it sane.

I made the code change, but it's getting too late for me to do enough
testing to feel OK about posting patches. This sound good though?
-- 
Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@alum.mit.edu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001212012641.C96105>