Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 09:45:43 -0400 From: Scott Reber <sreber@atltechgroup.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_4_3 calls itself -RELEASE? Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20010803094032.00b989d0@atltechgroup.com> In-Reply-To: <012701c11c21$1e6bbc00$94cba8c0@xena> References: <01080300314100.00395@spatula.home> <20010802170621.A7087@freeway.dcfinc.com> <01080301194203.00395@spatula.home> <20010802234312Z.jkh@freebsd.org> <006f01c11c1f$b6c0ff30$94cba8c0@xena>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 8/3/01 09:35 AM -0400, Drew Derbyshire wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Drew Derbyshire" <avatar+august2001@kew.com> >To: "Jordan Hubbard" <jkh@freebsd.org> >Cc: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> >Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 9:25 AM >Subject: Re: RELENG_4_3 calls itself -RELEASE? > > > > How about 4.4-RELENG? :-) or 4.4-POSTRELEASE. I also don't mind BEET >... > > I would prefer it didn't report BEET. > >Taken as a whole, this (previous) message nicely contradicts itself. > >Note to self: Don't write e-mail before breakfast. Also try proofreading >for a change. I bad. *poof* How about 4.x-PRODUCTION for the Security only fix branch? Since this is typically why it is used. ___________________________________________________________ Scott Reber voice: 770 977-7044 AtLANta TEChnical Group, Inc. fax: 770 793-8955 sreber@atltechgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20010803094032.00b989d0>