Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jul 1999 15:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Tani Hosokawa <unknown@riverstyx.net>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: NT vs Linux vs FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907141527100.30302-100000@avarice.riverstyx.net>
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19990714160756.046fdbf0@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, Brett Glass wrote:

> At 02:46 PM 7/14/99 -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> 
>  >You don't get the same programs, libraries or configuration files at all.
> 
> >For instance Caldera includes KDE, Qt, a Qt based installer and IIRC
> >system configuration tool Caldera also has different tools for package
> >management. RedHat does not; RedHat is also available for non x86
> >platforms.
> 
> As I understand it, by Wes's criteria, this wouldn't count because Linux
> itself came from the same CVS tree.

Actually, there is no CVS tree for Linux :)  I don't see what the big deal
is.  Who cares?

---
tani hosokawa
river styx internet




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.10.9907141527100.30302-100000>