Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 19:59:37 +0000 From: Mike Muir <mmuir@es.co.nz> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday Message-ID: <39035629.BC369DD4@es.co.nz> References: <200004231922.MAA63538@apollo.backplane.com> <45851.956517875@critter.freebsd.dk> <200004231947.NAA08296@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams wrote: > I was under the impression that 4.x hasn't been designated as the stable > branch (yet). That will happen when 4.1 is released, but until that > happens 3.x is still considered the -stable release. That would kinda make sense since cvsuping with tag=RELENG_3 seems to give me FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE (#0: Sat Apr 22 20:59:03 PDT 2000).. But besides that, this whole back and forth dont-do-this-do-that charade is going to get pretty juvenile soon.. I mean we're (matt) already at bad memory insults heh so how bout you both kiss/reevaluate and make up before it gets so bad you try to keep away from each other next time you're both at one of these conventions or whatever.. hmm now theres an uncomfortable situation to be in for both sides. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39035629.BC369DD4>