Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 May 2001 04:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   RE: New strategy of locking a process group
Message-ID:  <XFMail.010522044838.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200105220637.f4M6bDD40713@rina.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 22-May-01 Seigo Tanimura wrote:
> For now, p_mtx protects p_pgrp in struct proc. This is quite
> troublesome for the following reason:

Err, it doesn't really.  It's mostly undecided at this point.  Also, have you
looked at the BSD/OS code on builder?  They have process groups and sessions
already locked not using global locks but using per-data structure locks.

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.010522044838.jhb>