Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 22:40:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Sean Cavanaugh <Millenia2000@hotmail.com> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@freebsd.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netbooks vs FreeBSD Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905232239440.27154@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <BAY126-DS360C373365E30C34D8157CA570@phx.gbl> References: <4A17FFAF.4010400@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905231808430.25076@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <BAY126-DS360C373365E30C34D8157CA570@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> >> point 2 and 3 is somehow incompatible - HDD takes more power. anyway in >> order of few watts, compared to CPUs taking 20-50W, excluding those really >> "mobile". so >4 hours on battery&HDD seems possible. >> > > I respectfully disagree. As much as I hate Apple as a company, I currently > have a MacBook Pro that gets over 4 hours of battery life and has a 200+gig > HDD in it. > i wrote "somehow incompatible" :) your macbook pro would run even more hours on the same battery with flash drive. i don't know how much your CPU gets power, and ... how oversized battery it has
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0905232239440.27154>