Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:53:20 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> To: =?UTF-8?B?xYF1a2FzeiBXxIVzaWtvd3NraQ==?= <lukasz@wasikowski.net>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: State of the Porters' Handbook Message-ID: <526E2600.9010409@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <526E2492.9080107@wasikowski.net> References: <526E234F.3090005@bsdforen.de> <526E2492.9080107@wasikowski.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28/10/2013 09:47, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote: > W dniu 2013-10-28 09:41, Dominic Fandrey pisze: > >> Neither staging nor license management are described in the Porters' >> Handbook. >> >> Why again should we bother to support it? >> >> What happened to "the feature that is not documented doesn't exist"? > > Lack of good documentation is real problem for me to convert ports to > staging. Porter's Handbook is seriously lagging behind recent changes - > staging, license management, shabang fixes, etc. If it was up for a vote, I'd vote for a feature stop until the PH is back in a decent condition. Kudos to the people who documented the new options framework. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?526E2600.9010409>