Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Sep 1998 13:52:56 +0800
From:      Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Cc:        jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), chuckr@mat.net, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: elf & compat 
Message-ID:  <199809230552.NAA12900@spinner.netplex.com.au>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 23 Sep 1998 03:14:11 GMT." <199809230314.UAA17867@usr06.primenet.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > They're still being built, tho.  I want that for aout, but not elf,
> > > right?
> > 
> > Uh, right.  Compat libs for things which never existed in ELF form
> > would be somewhat superfluous, doncha think? :-)
> 
> So a program which, when build a.out, require an a.out libgnumalloc,
> will, when built ELF, *not* require an ELF libgnumalloc?
> 
> How does that work?

They were provided for link-time compatability with old a.out binaries.  
We have not been providing gnumalloc at all for some time.

The presense of the ELF libgnumalloc stub is just an oversight.

The reason for /usr/lib/compat in the first place was so that ld and 
autoconfig wouldn't "find" -lgnumalloc or -lresolv etc, but without 
busting backwards compatability with "old" binaries.

> 
> 					Terry Lambert
> 					terry@lambert.org

Cheers,
-Peter




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809230552.NAA12900>